One-year outcomes following rehabilitation for chronic hip-related groin pain: ancillary analysis of a pilot randomized clinical trial

Purpose: Rehabilitation to address modifiable factors associated with chronic hip-related groin pain (CHRGP) may lead to reduced pain and improved function, yet little is known about its effectiveness. We assessed the preliminary effects of two interventions that target two distinct mechanisms, sensory disturbances and abnormal movement patterns. Sensory disturbances such as peripheral and central sensitization may contribute to pain persistence long after initial injury. Joint mobilization (JtMob) may impart a neurophysiological response within the nervous system that results in pain reduction and improved mobility. Abnormal movement patterns may create altered mechanical stresses on hip joint structures, resulting in pain and activity limitations. Movement pattern training (MoveTrain) may improve movement patterns and thus patient function. Method(s): Patients with CHRGP, 18-40, were enrolled. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, clinical exam, and quantitative sensory testing. Outcomes included the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), a patient-reported outcome;frontal plane kinematics of hip, pelvis, and trunk during single leg squat;and pain pressure threshold (PPT) assessed at the anterior groin of the most bothersome hip and dominant thenar eminence (local and generalized pressure hypersensitivity, respectively). Patients were randomized to JtMob or MoveTrain in a 1:1 ratio stratified by sex and HOOS Symptoms. Treatment for both groups included 10 individualized visits over 12 weeks with a trained physical therapist (PT);assessment of patient goals and education which focused on patient-specific tasks reported by the patient to be symptom-producing;instruction in a home exercise program (HEP);and handouts that provided education, description and benefits of assigned treatment and instructions for HEP. The key element of JtMob was PT-provided manual techniques using specific criteria to determine the joint mobilization techniques and parameters used for each patient. The patient's symptom report to each technique was monitored and if indicated, the technique modified according to our outlined procedures. The HEP included flexibility exercises. The key element of MoveTrain was task-specific instruction to correct abnormal movement patterns displayed during daily and patient-specific tasks. For example, hip adduction was minimized during a step descent. The HEP included repeated practice of modified tasks. Task difficulty was progressed based on each patient's performance. Immediately after treatment completion, patients returned for follow up assessment. To assess treatment sustainability after the active treatment phase, we collected HOOS at 6 and 12 months (extended follow-up), and kinematics and PPT at 12 months. Data from patients who provided any data after baseline were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) with baseline value as a covariate, patient as a random effect, and an autoregressive covariance structure. After adjusting for baseline, the between-group difference in change from post-treatment to each extended follow-up results from pre-planned statistical contrasts in a RM-ANOVA that includes main effects for treatment group, visit and the group by visit interaction. The within-group treatment effect at each extended follow-up was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point from the later follow-up within each treatment group. Dependent samples t-tests were used to assess the degree of within-group change. Result(s): Demographics and outcome data are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Thirty-three patients with CHRGP were randomized and 29 (88%) provided post-treatment data. Four patients did not complete treatment or post-treatment testing (3 due to COVID pandemic, 1 lost to follow up);6 patients did not complete 12 month laboratory testing (due to pandemic), but did complete 12 month questionnaires. Previously, we reported that both groups reported clinically important improvements in HOOS subscales and MoveTrain group improved hip and pelvis kinematics immediately after treatment compared to baseline. After adjusting for baseline, there were no between-group differences in change in outcomes between post-treatment and extended follow-up when comparing JtMob and MoveTrain, indicating that treatment effects immediately post-treatment were maintained at 12 months after treatment completion. Conclusion(s): Our preliminary findings suggest that 12 weeks of JtMob or MoveTrain, may result in improvements in patient-reported pain and function and these effects may persist 12 months after treatment completion. A future, larger trial to definitively assess the efficacy of JtMob and MoveTrain and identify factors associated with long-term outcomes will improve our ability to develop treatment strategies for people with CHRGP. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

Four cases of acute comitant esotropia associated with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma in children.

BACKGROUND: Acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) is usually a benign form of strabismus that infrequently is associated with intracranial pathology. Clinicians have noted an increase in its incidence and theorize that it may be related to public health "lockdown" measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. With an increased incidence of AACE clinicians must firstly differentiate AACE from common accommodative esotropia and secondly recognize AACE as a possible sign of serious neuropathology.Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) is a devastating diagnosis for affected families. Children typically present at age 6-7 years with cranial nerve palsies, long tract signs, and/or cerebellar signs. Diagnosis is made from characteristic findings on magnetic resonance brain imaging (MRI brain) and treatment includes radiotherapy and palliative care. Two years from diagnosis, 90% of affected children will have died from their disease. CASE SERIES: We present four cases that attended our pediatric ophthalmology clinic with AACE either as a presenting sign of DIPG or as a clinical finding following a DIPG diagnosis. Patient A (age 5 years) presented to the emergency eye clinic with sudden onset diplopia and intermittent esotropia. Suppression later developed, they had 0.00 logMAR visual acuity either eye, and bilateral physiological hypermetropia. MRI brain imaging requested as a result of the unusual presentation led to the DIPG diagnosis. The other 3 cases (ages 11, 5 & 5 years) were assessed post DIPG diagnosis and found to have an esotropia measuring bigger on 1/3-meter fixation than 6-meter fixation, full ocular motility, physiological hypermetropia or emmetropia, and visual acuity normal for age. Other than patient B (age 11 years), who had papilledema and gaze evoked nystagmus when they were assessed 2 weeks prior to death, no patient had any other clinical eye findings. CONCLUSIONS: This small series of 4 patients attending our clinic within a 12-month period supports the notion that children presenting with AACE should routinely be offered brain MRI. Not all children with DIPG-associated AACE have significant ophthalmic findings indicative of intracranial pathology. With the potential for increased incidence of AACE related to lockdowns, clinicians should be reminded of the infrequent possibility their patient has a more serious condition.

Actin cytoskeleton remodeling primes RIG-I-like receptor activation.

The current dogma of RNA-mediated innate immunity is that sensing of immunostimulatory RNA ligands is sufficient for the activation of intracellular sensors and induction of interferon (IFN) responses. Here, we report that actin cytoskeleton disturbance primes RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) activation. Actin cytoskeleton rearrangement induced by virus infection or commonly used reagents to intracellularly deliver RNA triggers the relocalization of PPP1R12C, a regulatory subunit of the protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), from filamentous actin to cytoplasmic RLRs. This allows dephosphorylation-mediated RLR priming and, together with the RNA agonist, induces effective RLR downstream signaling. Genetic ablation of PPP1R12C impairs antiviral responses and enhances susceptibility to infection with several RNA viruses including SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, picornavirus, and vesicular stomatitis virus. Our work identifies actin cytoskeleton disturbance as a priming signal for RLR-mediated innate immunity, which may open avenues for antiviral or adjuvant design.

Strategies for COVID-19 Vaccine Education for Workers in Nursing Homes in Ontario, Canada: An Environmental Scan

Background: Older adults living in nursing homes have borne the brunt of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination of staff in nursing homes is critical to protect this vulnerable population. However, there has been significant vaccine hesitancy observed amongst healthcare workers globally. We conducted an environmental scan to understand both formal and informal educational interventions that were delivered to staff in nursing homes in Ontario, Canada, with respect to the COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: We conducted structured interviews (verbal [n=11] and written [n=4]) with Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and management in nursing homes and collected data from relevant articles in a scoping review. Data collection took place between May 10, 2021 and October 13, 2021. Our analysis was guided by a behavioural science framework, and we triangulated findings from the interviews and scoping review. Results: 14 of the 15 participants reported using one-on-one informal conversations as the primary approach to education for vaccine-hesitant staff. A variety of formal presentations, supplemented with written information, were also common. The facilitators of the education were often peers (“staff champions”), NPs, and Directors of Care. Equity, diversity, and inclusion (e.g. providing education in different languages, tailoring to education level) were sometimes considered in one-on-one conversation but were rarely considered in formal education. The most common barrier to providing education to nursing home staff was time constraints. Findings from the scoping review also suggested that personalized, non-judgemental conversations with trusted educators supported the increase of vaccine confidence. It is important to have diverse educators (including “staff champions”) to build trust among minority populations that are disproportionately vaccine-hesitant. Conclusion: Since the majority of the education is through one-on-one conversations, a “train the trainer” approach would be helpful to empower educators to have effective conversations. Equity, diversity, and inclusion considerations are important for accessibility and trust, but often overlooked.

COMPARISON OF MOVEMENT PATTERN TRAINING AND JOINT MOBILIZATION FOR CHRONIC PREARTHRITIC HIP DISORDERS: A PILOT RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Purpose: A clear need exists to rigorously assess treatment strategies for chronic prearthritic hip disorders (PAHD). We assessed the preliminary effects of two physical therapist-led interventions that target two distinct mechanisms, abnormal movement patterns and sensory disturbances. Abnormal movement patterns, such as excessive hip adduction, may create altered mechanical stresses on hip joint structures, resulting in subsequent injury, pain and activity limitations. Movement pattern training (MoveTrain) may improve movement patterns and patient-reported outcomes, however further investigation is needed to be definitive. Sensory disturbances such as peripheral sensitization and central sensitization (aka nociplastic pain) may also contribute to pain persistence long after an initial injury. Joint mobilization (JtMob) is proposed to impart a neurophysiological response within the peripheral and central nervous system that results in pain reduction and improved mobility, yet the investigation of JtMob for the treatment of PAHD is limited. Methods: Patients, 18-40 years, with chronic PAHD were recruited. Baseline assessment included self-report questionnaire completion, clinical examination and quantitative sensory testing. The primary outcome was the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), a hip-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included movement evoked pain assessed with a repetitive step down task and a repetitive deep squat task, and pain pressure threshold assessed at the anterior groin of the most bothersome hip (local pressure hypersensitivity) and the dominant thenar eminence (generalized pressure hypersensitivity). After baseline assessment, patients were randomized into 1 of 2 treatment groups, MoveTrain or JtMob. Randomization was stratified by sex and HOOS Symptoms quartile, as determined from data collected during previous study. Treatment was provided by 4 experienced physical therapists (2 in each treatment arm) who were trained in standardized procedures. Treatment for both groups included 10 supervised sessions over 12 weeks and incorporated assessment of patient goals, patient education and instruction in a home program. Patient education focused on patient-specific tasks, such as work or fitness activities, identified by each patient to be symptom-producing. The goal of MoveTrain was to reduce stresses on the hip joint by optimizing the biomechanics of daily and patient-specific tasks. The key element of MoveTrain was task-specific instruction to correct abnormal movement patterns demonstrated during daily tasks and patient-specific tasks. For example, hip adduction and femoral internal rotation were minimized during step-down tasks. The home program included repeated practice of the modified tasks. Difficulty of the tasks were progressed based on each patient’s performance. The goal of JtMob was to reduce pain and improve pain-free motion of the hip. The key element of JtMob was manual techniques provided by the physical therapist. Specific criteria were used to determine the joint mobilization techniques and parameters used for each patient. The patient’s symptom report to each technique was monitored and if indicated, the technique modified according to our outlined procedures. The home program included flexibility exercises. Immediately after treatment completion, patients returned for follow up assessment. Data collected at baseline and post-treatment were analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using a generalized linear model where change is the dependent variable and baseline is the covariate. The adjusted immediate treatment effect was calculated by subtracting the least squares mean change between baseline and post for MoveTrain minus JtMob from the ANCOVA, and assesses the between-group difference in change after adjusting for baseline. Results: Thirty-three patients with PAHD were randomized. Demographics are provided in Table 1. Four patients did not complete treatment or post-treatment testing (3 due to COVID pandemic, 1 lost t follow up);7 patients did not complete post-treatment laboratory testing (due to COVID), but did complete post-treatment questionnaires. Both groups demonstrated clinically important within-group improvements in the HOOS subscales and movement evoked pain ratings after treatment (Table 2). No changes were noted in pain pressure threshold for either group. After adjusting for baseline, there were no between-group differences in change in outcomes when comparing MoveTrain and JtMob. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that 12 weeks of physical therapist-led intervention, including either MoveTrain or JtMob, may result in improvements in patient-reported pain and activities limitations. Further investigation is needed to determine the sustained effects of each treatment and to determine if specific patient factors are associated with treatment prognosis. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]